Thursday, June 27, 2019

Dr.JP's Letter to the Hon'ble Chief Minister of AP Sri YS Jagan Mohan Reddy

27th June 2019

Sri Y.S. Jagan Mohan Reddy
Chief Minister of Andhra Pradesh
Andhra Pradesh

Dear Sri Jagan Mohan Reddy garu,

I have read news reports of the Collectors’ Conference where you expressed your resolve to end corruption and deliver services to the poor in a time-bound and efficient manner. I wholeheartedly welcome your government’s commitment to corruption-free, competent service delivery. Andhra Pradesh enacted the Public Service Delivery Guarantee (PSDG) Act for 40 services under Business Action Reform Plan 2017. However, this law has been limited to industries, and has not been extended to all other government services that can be realistically brought under this framework. Enactment of a well-designed service delivery legislation defining the competent authorities, timelines for delivery of service (clearances, approvals, licenses, renewals) and compensation to applicants in case of delay and mechanisms to appeal are the necessary features of an accountable government. Such a law will have far greater impact on governance than even the Right to Information Act and Lokpal Act.

Foundation for Democratic Reforms and Lok Satta movement have been working on Citizens’ Charters and a service guarantee law for several years. We have also had detailed interaction with the Parliamentary Committee on the subject. At the instance of the Parliamentary Committee, we have prepared a draft Bill integrating normal service delivery with electronic services. In this age of increasing computerization, it is vital that we integrate all forms of services and ensure a single, effective, enforceable law to improve most services to ordinary people and ensure convergence of services to facilitate easy access.

I am herewith enclosing the draft Public Service Delivery Guarantee Bill for Andhra Pradesh. The key features of The Draft Bill that can be provided for all the services in the state:

1. Statutorily Guaranteed Citizen’s Charters for all Public Services

The Draft Bill mandates every 'public authority’ as defined under clause (q) of section 2 of the Bill to publish Citizens’ Charters, specifying the list of goods and services offered by the public authority, the names and the details of the official responsible, the time-limit for the delivery and in case of delay/denial of service, a robust complaint redressal mechanism. Additionally, the ‘public authority’ has an obligation to periodically review, update and verify the Citizens’ Charters.

2. Effective and Instant Grievance Redressal Mechanism

Every public authority must establish information and facilitation centres and customer care helplines, as a part of the complaint redressal mechanism. Moreover, every public authority must designate as many officers, at the Department level, as Grievance Redressal Officers in order to receive, inquire into and redress any complaints from citizens. Such grievances must be disposed of in a time frame not exceeding thirty days from the date of receipt. This provision is in sharp contrast to a regular lawsuit that is generally time-consuming and cost ineffective.

3. Lean process of appeal

A citizen aggrieved by the decision of the concerned Grievance Redressal Officer in respect of a complaint filed by him, may within thirty days from the expiry, file an appeal to the Independent Designated Authority (IDA), who is the first appellate authority at the Corporation/District level. The IDA shall dispose such appeal within a time frame not exceeding thirty days. Thereafter, any citizen, who is aggrieved by the decision of the IDA, may file a second appeal to the office of the Lokayukta, who is the highest appellate authority under the said Bill.

4. Penalty and Compensation mechanism

The Draft Bill confers power upon the two appellate authorities, namely, the Independent Designated Authority and the office of the Lokayukta, to impose penalty on the erring public official, who is responsible for delivery of goods and services or the concerned Grievance Redressal Officer for failure to deliver goods and services to the aggrieved citizen within the specified time-limit. Also, the Independent Designated Authority or the office of the Lokayukta shall ensure that the aggrieved citizen is compensated by an amount which is equivalent to the penalty imposed against the designated official.

5. Burden of Proof

The draft Bill further provides that in any appeal proceedings, the burden of proof to establish a non-redressal of complaint by the Grievance Redressal Officer shall be on the Grievance Redressal Officer who denied the request to such aggrieved citizen. This Draft PSDG Bill would effectively translate into reality your government’s commitment to deliver goods and services for not just industries but also in all departments a transparent, accountable and responsive manner. It will also lessen the burden on the public exchequer, as the existing Lokayukta will be the apex authority supervising and ensuring the overall implementation of the PSDG regime. Consequently, the existing judicial mechanism vested with the Lokayukta will be further strengthened.

I urge you to take steps to speedily enact a public service delivery law on these lines with such improvements as you deem fit. The poorer segments of our population and the deprived sections – SCs, STs, BCs and Minorities – are particularly vulnerable to extortionary corruption, delays and harassment. A robust legal framework and practical measures to ensure timely and effective delivery of services will go a long way in fulfilling your commitment and improving governance.

We will be happy to interact with you and your officials to help enact a sound law to make the governance and bureaucracy accessible, transparent and accountable.

With warm personal regards,

Yours sincerely,

Jayaprakash Narayan
General Secretary

Copy to:
Sri Ajeya Kallam, IAS Retd, Principal Advisor to Chief Minister of AP.
Sri LV Subramanyam, IAS Chief Secretary to Govt.

The Draft Bill can be downloaded from

Monday, June 17, 2019

Debate on 3-language system uncalled for: Jayaprakash Narayan

The founder president of Loksatta Party Jayaprakash Narayan opined that the BJP government had unnecessarily raised the issue of three-language system, diverting attention from debate on quality education.

Baghlingampally: The founder president of Loksatta Party Jayaprakash Narayan opined that the BJP government had unnecessarily raised the issue of three-language system, diverting attention from debate on quality education. He was speaking at a round-table on National Education Policy 2019, organised by MV Foundation, here at Sundaraiah Vignana Kendram.

Speaking on the occasion, Jayaprakash Narayan expressed his concern over lack of quality education in Telugu states despite heavy spending by the governments. Telugu states spend nearly Rs 14,000 crore on education, Rs 70,000 per each student, but quality of the education remains abysmal, he lamented. Expressing his angst at mass copying which is still prevalent in 95 per cent of schools in Telugu states, he said poor students are being deprived of quality education due to such malpractices.

Allocating 25 per cent of seats to poor students could not be a lone solution for the proper implementation of Right to Education Act, he said. "It is unfortunate that not even a single political leader discussed issues in education system during their election campaign," he said. Jayaprakash urged governments to take necessary measures to improve education standards. He said that teachers are focused more on the integrated service rules rather than on imparting quality education.

National convener of MV Foundation R Venkat Reddy said that governments have failed miserably in providing quality education. Ruling parties change but the education standards remained same, he said.

IAS officer A Murali gave a Powerpoint presentation on the state of education. President of Telangana Parents Association N Narayana, JVV president Professor Adhinarayana, representative of Action Aid Vara Prasad and others participated in the discussion.

Courtesy: The Hans India

త్రిభాషా విధానంపై చర్చ అనవసరం

Saturday, June 15, 2019

Monday, June 10, 2019